Sustainability
Sustainability
Less packaging.
More planet.
Every MXTOLOGY cocktail is pouched, not bottled โ a lightweight, flat-shipping pouch instead of a heavy glass bottle or aluminium can. It's the single biggest thing we do for the planet. Here's the honest, sourced story behind it.
Leave nothing behind
Are cocktail pouches better for the environment than bottles? For carbon, the life-cycle evidence says yes. Flexible pouches are far lighter, ship flat, and don't need a 1,500ยฐC furnace or energy-hungry smelter to make. Independent and industry life-cycle assessments put a pouch's greenhouse-gas footprint dramatically below glass and aluminium โ an ifeu (2021) study found a flexible pouch had 63% lower climate impact than a glass jar and 69% lower than a steel can.* The honest trade-off is end-of-life: soft-plastic recycling in Australia is limited right now โ which is exactly the problem our next-generation pouch is being designed to solve.
Why we pouched it
Glass and aluminium carry a heavy footprint
Before a drop is even poured, the container has already done most of the environmental damage. Here's how the three formats stack up.
Glass
- Melted in furnaces hotter than 1,500ยฐC โ among the most energy-intensive steps in packaging.*
- A single empty wine bottle weighs roughly 350โ600g, before it's even filled.*
- In a bottle of wine, the glass alone can be the single biggest contributor to its carbon footprint (~29%+).*
- Breaks โ which is why most beaches and festivals ban it.
Aluminium
- Primary aluminium averages ~14.8 t COโe per tonne of metal produced.*
- Smelting draws roughly 14 kWh of electricity per kg.*
- Recycling saves ~95% of that energy โ but only if the can actually gets recycled.*
The pouch
- In beverage life-cycle studies, the flexible pouch had the lowest greenhouse-gas footprint of every format tested.*
- Almost all of its weight is drink, not packaging โ roughly 97% product, 3% packaging.*
- Ships flat and light, so far more cocktails fit in every truck โ fewer trips, less fuel.*
- No glass to break, so it's welcome where bottles aren't.
Where we won't greenwash
The honest bit: end-of-life
We could slap a green leaf and a "recyclable" badge on every pouch. We won't โ because in Australia right now, that wouldn't be the full truth. Soft-plastic recycling took a major hit when the REDcycle programme paused in 2022, and today the majority of soft plastics still end up in landfill. Kerbside soft-plastic collection isn't yet available to most households.
So instead of overclaiming, we're being straight with you: a MXTOLOGY pouch already wins big on the carbon and transport side of the ledger โ and we're putting our energy into solving the end-of-life side properly, rather than printing a symbol that most Australians can't act on.
What we're working toward
The next pouch
A better material
We're working toward a next-generation pouch designed for genuine recyclability and lower impact โ so the end-of-life story matches the carbon story.
Plantable, one day
Our long-term vision: a fully biodegradable pouch with seeds embedded in it, so what's left can be planted and grow a tree. Ambitious โ and the goal we're chasing.
Lighter every trip
We keep packaging weight and shipping emissions as low as we can, because the lightest, flattest pack is also the lowest-carbon one to move.
Sustainability FAQ
Your questions
Are cocktail pouches better for the environment than glass bottles?
Why does MXTOLOGY use pouches instead of bottles or cans?
Are MXTOLOGY pouches recyclable?
How much lower is a pouch's carbon footprint?
Can I take pouched cocktails where glass is banned?
Sources & references
Where our numbers come from
- ifeu (Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Heidelberg), life-cycle assessment of flexible vs rigid packaging, 2021 โ flexible pouch ~63% lower climate impact than a glass jar, ~69% lower than a steel can (commissioned by Flexible Plastics Europe).
- Flexible Packaging Association, A Holistic View of the Role of Flexible Packaging in a Sustainable World (2018) โ single-serve beverage life-cycle comparison (pouch vs glass, aluminium, PET); product-to-package ratio and GHG findings. Industry-commissioned LCA.
- International Aluminium Institute โ primary aluminium ~14.8 t COโe/tonne (2023); smelting energy; recycling saves ~95% of primary energy. international-aluminium.org
- Glass melting temperatures (1,500ยฐC+) โ International Journal of Applied Glass Science, 2024; glass melting is the most energy-intensive stage of production.
- Glass share of a wine's carbon footprint (~29%+) โ California Wine Institute; supported by peer-reviewed wine LCA (Cleary et al., Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2023).
- Transport & flat-shipping efficiency of empty flexible packaging โ Flexible Packaging Association.
- Australian soft-plastic recycling status (REDcycle paused 2022; majority of soft plastics to landfill; Soft Plastics Taskforce in-store pilot) โ Clean Up Australia; ACCC.
- Environmental marketing claims framed per the ACCC's Making environmental claims guidance (2023).
*Figures are drawn from the specific life-cycle assessments and sources listed above. Several are industry-commissioned, single-product LCAs; we present them as strong, directional evidence rather than a single universal figure, and we update this page as better data emerges.
A better cocktail. A lighter footprint.
Real cocktails, made fresh in Australia, in a pouch that's kinder to carry โ and to the planet.
Shop the pouches18+ only. Drink responsibly. Each pouch's exact ABV and standard drinks appear on its product page.